Out of some GHS6.5 billion in cedi deposit claims validated by the receiver of the failed Specialised Deposit-Taking Institutions (SDIs) in Ghana, an amount of GHS6.39 billion has been paid in cash to the depositors, Mrs Elsie Addo Awadzi, Second Deputy Governor, Bank of Ghana, has revealed.
This leaves a “balance of GHS110 million, being claims of related parties (shareholders, directors, and affiliates) of the defunct institutions who played active roles in their management and control”, Mrs Awadzi told journalists at a media sensitisation programme organised by the Ghana Association of Savings and Loans Companies, Association of Finance Houses, and Ghana Association of Microfinance Companies in Accra on Tuesday, 13 October 2020.
SDIs are made up of Savings and Loans Companies, Finance Houses, and Microfinance Companies, together with Rural and Community Banks.
They are regulated under the Banks and Specialised Deposit-Taking Institutions Act of 2016 (Act 930).
According to Mrs Awadsi, “these institutions have been licensed by the Bank of Ghana to provide access to finance to segments of our society that would typically not be able to access financial services from commercial banks.”
Due to mismanagement and other infractions, however, the Bank of Ghana had to revoke the licences of 347 insolvent microfinance companies and 39 microcredit companies on 31 May 2019.
“It is important to note that 155 of these Microfinance Companies and 10 of the Micro Credit Companies had already ceased operations and had been dormant for a number of years”, Mrs Awadzi said, adding: “On 16th August 2019, Bank of Ghana also revoked the licences of 15 insolvent Savings and Loan Companies and 8 insolvent Finance House Companies”.
She said the affairs of the defunct SDIs are currently being wound down in accordance with relevant laws but the government “stepped in to provide financial relief for their depositors and employees, so that they did not have to wait for years to see if any value might be realised out of the assets of these institutions before they got paid, if at all”.
Together, she noted, “the SDI sector has contributed significantly to our nation’s socio-economic development by serving individuals and micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises. But for SDIs, a big vacuum would have existed in our financial system today”.
According to her, “At the end of July 2020, the assets of SDIs constituted 8.47 per cent of total banking sector assets, and their deposit base and loans made up 7.70 per cent and 14.28 per cent, respectively of the entire banking sector”.
She mentioned that Savings and Loans Companies, Finance House Companies, and Microfinance Companies, currently operate through a total of 1,070 branches nationwide serving about 1.5 million individuals and businesses and also offer thousands of jobs.
Additionally, she said they provide loans for commerce and finance; salaried workers as well as transportation, communication, agriculture, forestry, fishing, small-scale construction, mining and the manufacturing sectors of the economy “amounting to about GHS5.7 billion as of July 2020, with loan amounts per customer ranging from a little over GHS1000 to GHS20,000 and beyond”.
Despite the role of the SDIs, Mrs Awadzi said, it has faced challenges over the years.
“As you may know, many of the microfinance companies that were licensed from 2012 were ‘grandfathered’ into the then-new microfinance licensing regime without the requisite due diligence done on them. Several of them had operated for a number of years without regulation, and upon being licensed, continued with business as usual, without compliance with licensing requirements and other regulatory norms, and without understanding that as financial institutions, they had to operate under prudent management and strong internal controls to ensure the safety of their depositors’ funds”, she explained.
Additionally, she noted that a number of Savings and Loans Companies and Finance Houses also “strayed away from their mandates under the licences issued by the Bank of Ghana, and tried to operate as banks without the requisite amounts of capital or the expertise to manage the risks they were taking”.
“Instead of taking small deposits and lending small amounts of money per customer, they took on large deposits and made large loans, and placed significant amount of funds with other SDIs and related parties with little or no prospects of getting back these funds.
“Essentially, it is these factors, namely, poor capitalisation, poor business models, poor governance and risk management, and in some cases fraud and dishonesty, that led to many of these institutions collapsing in the last few years starting with the famous or infamous DKM in 2016, and subsequently many more”.
Mrs Awadzi, thus, said the “clean-up of the SDI sector was necessary”.
“First of all, the laws under which we regulate these institutions require that we revoke their licenses when they are no longer able to honour their obligations to their customers, after they failed to address unsafe and unsound 6 practices, and solvency and liquidity challenges.
“Secondly, it was important to protect depositors of these institutions whose deposits had been locked up for months and years, and the general public that continued to do business with these institutions without knowing their true financial condition.
“Thirdly, the safety of the financial system was at stake, as confidence in the entire system was being eroded. The public simply did not know the difference between an SDI that was distressed and one that was not. Once the public began to see signs of certain SDIs being unable to honour their obligations to their customers, they started to demand a return of their deposits from other financial institutions, leading to challenges for those institutions that were otherwise strong”, she said.